Insights

All Topics
All Months
Reading Time | < 1 min 09 May 2016

Confirmation statement to replace annual return

Reading Time • < 1 min

A new confirmation statement is due to replace the annual return from June 2016.

Companies will be required to provide information to the registrar at least once a year. This can be delivered as a confirmation statement.

Unlike annual returns, there are no set dates to submit a confirmation statement during the year. However, no more than 12 months can be passed from the original statement when submitted.

Companies will need to ‘check and confirm’ their information and inform Companies House if any changes would like to be made.

The differences between the confirmation statement and the annual return include:

  • where elections have been made to keep any legal registers at Companies House, a statement confirming all information on those registered will need to be submitted
  • where a company is exempt from keeping a PSC register, a statement is required of the fact that it is exempt, unless the information has not changed since it was last provided
  • a requirement to supply the information on a company’s PSC register, unless the company is exempt or has elected to keep its PSC register at Companies House.

All companies and limited liability partnerships (LLPS) must now keep a register of persons with significant control (PSC).

Companies are required to record the information of individuals with significant control on a PSC register and filed with Companies House from 30 June 2016.

Contact us today to discuss business compliance.

Read full article
Reading Time | < 1 min 05 May 2016

Call for businesses to bear more responsibility for online scams

Reading Time • < 1 min

Businesses have been urged to take greater responsibility in protecting customers from online fraud and scams.

6 in 10 people have been targeted by online fraud and scams in the past 12 months, according to research by Which?

The government launched the Joint Fraud Taskforce in February 2016 to improve businesses across all sectors to protect the customers from fraud and scams.

The research also found that consumer behaviour is being affected by the fear of scams. 50% of those surveyed reported staying away from online products, services and apps for fear of being targeted by scammers.

3 of the most common online scams identified include:

  • phishing emails claiming to be from a bank or payment service
  • messages that seek money for services or help 
  • bogus computer support.

Which? has called on the Joint Fraud taskforce to:

  • find out if businesses are taking responsibility to protect their customers from fraud and scams
  • what improvements should be made to the processes, systems and practices
  • recommendations by the end of the year to implement the solutions.

Which? executive director, Richard Lloyd, said: 

‘When we know that even the savviest people can be scammed by fraudsters, it's vital that everything possible is done by businesses to better protect consumers. And where firms haven't done enough to protect their customers, it's entirely right that the responsibility to put things right should be with them.”

Contact us today to discuss insurance.

Read full article
Reading Time | < 1 min 03 May 2016

Apprenticeship levy could lead to businesses abandoning training

Reading Time • < 1 min

The Confederation of British Industry (CBI) has called for a ‘radical rethink’ of the apprenticeship levy ahead of its April 2017 introduction.

Carolyn Fairbairn, CBI director general has warned of fundamental flaws to the levy’s guidelines which could encourage employers to abandon their existing training programmes in order to cover the levy’s costs.

From 6 April 2017, businesses with annual earnings of more than £3 million will need to pay a 0.5% levy to fund apprenticeships. 

Employers will also receive a £15,000 allowance, available through the Digital Apprenticeship Service to offset the levy costs.

The CBI has called for the following:

  • stronger role for the institute for apprenticeships, including measuring and managing the system around the levy
  • more flexibility on the levy and the way it is spent, including training and high quality support
  • the digital system for managing levy spend needs to support the delivery of apprenticeship training for businesses.

Fairbairn, added:

“Currently, the levy misunderstands training only as apprenticeships and the current design encourages firms to rebadge their existing programmes.

“Companies are having to change the ‘spec’ of graduate or management training schemes - programmes that are working perfectly well - just to fit apprenticeship standards.

“The government needs to work with business to resolve these issues before the levy launches. This means taking the time to get this right to design a flexible, business-led system – through the Institute – that encourages employers to spend on quality training opportunities.”

Talk to us today to find out more about the apprenticeship levy.

Read full article
1 91 92 93 94 95 346